that of the Indiana Supreme Court holding that “[a] corollary of the client’s right
to discharge a lawyer is that a contract
between the client and the lawyer that
unduly impairs that right is invalid.” 15
Such analyses essentially take the position that a client’s inviolable right to discharge the lawyer is not much of a right at
all if it would be too costly to assert. Like
WSBA Advisory Opinion 1864, courts
in Indiana, Georgia, and Colorado have
strongly suggested that regardless of the
fee agreement, a client who fires her attorney, at whatever stage of the representation, for whatever reason, is entitled to a
refund based in quantum meruit.
In our opinion, courts are unaware that
clients can manipulate these precepts in
order to deprive attorneys of fair compensation for work done or risk assumed. 16
For example, a 2009 Washington case almost certainly involved a situation where
the client “deliberately fired her attorney
to maximize her share of the generous
verdict.” 17 Washington attorneys can be
somewhat heartened by the fact that the
court indicated that, in instances of egregiously unconscionable client behavior,
more than an hour-based quantum meruit
attorney’s fee is permissible, even if the
client discharges the attorney. 18
What’s the Liability?
How should an attorney protect herself
for the eventuality that a client will come
knocking, wanting reimbursement in
a partially completed flat-rate matter
where the fee has been paid pursuant to
an agreement that complies with RPC
1. 5(f)( 2)? In many years of handling
trademark applications on a flat fee basis, attorney Mark Jordan of Invicta Law
Group has never had a dispute with a client about a partially earned flat fee. In the
event the full representation is not completed, “I sit down with the client and explain what portion of the fee I’ve earned
based on the work performed,” Mark explains. Indeed, flat fee matters generally
tend to represent relatively smaller fees,
and in a majority of scenarios the attorney will likely have the cash on hand to
return some or all of a single flat fee.
What happens, though, if all of an attorney’s flat fee clients come knocking?
What if the attorney — through no fault
of her own — is unable to continue her
work due to disability or family crisis?
What if she has an entire caseload of
partially completed flat-fee cases and
can complete none of them?
PEZ® Dispenser
Accounting
How does an attorney track her
level of financial exposure for
collected flat fees that she may
need to partially reimburse?
Experts recommend that law-
yers track time on all flat-rate
matters just as they would
with traditional billing. As Roberts points
out, this also gives the lawyer important
data to assess the value she is investing
in flat-rate matters, and she may want to
adjust fees accordingly. 19 This approach
offers a means to ensure that the attorney
always has cash on hand to reimburse a
client for a partially-earned, as defined by
RPC 1. 5(f)( 2), fee. The attorney deposits
each flat fee into her operating account,
but allows herself access only to the por-
tion of the fee that she has earned at a
Perkins Coie partners Stewart Landefeld and
Eric DeJong have co-authored Volume I of
Washington Business Entities: Law and Forms,
Second Edition. This indispensable treatise is
packed with critical information on creating,
maintaining and dissolving Washington State
business entities, including corresponding forms.
To purchase your copy visit:
http://bit.ly/WABusEntLaw.
Scan to download an excerpt:
CON TAC T: 800.586.8441 www.perkinscoie.com Perkins Coie LLP ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
©
I
S
TOC
K
PH
O
TO.
CO
M/
J
E
NG
RA
N
TH
AM